Monday, March 15, 2004

Godwin's Law

For those who are unfamiliar with this well-known net-meme, there's a definition here. The author, in this essay, describes how it originated as a memetic experiment -- a "counter-meme" run amok.

One can easily see why Godwin was tempted to create his counter-meme. It's all too easy in an inflammatory argument to start casually throwing "You're Like The Nazis" accusations around, trivializing the actual evil of the Holocaust and, usually, grossly misrepresenting the intentions of the other party. On the other hand, what about situations in which the doctrines or practices of the actual, historical National Socialist Party truly are relevant to the discussion? Seems the counter-meme may be a bit too broad in its attack, like an antibiotic that wipes out useful bacteria along with the pneumococci.

Beware! Blogs are infected with memes!

Memes, for those unfamiliar with the word, are a concept popularized by Richard Dawkins. They may be usefully thought of a mental constructs, ideas, which compete for mind-space and seek to reproduce themselves in as many minds as possible, in the same way that living beings compete for resources and seek to reproduce in as many environments as possible.

I do find the concept of meme-warfare fascinating. John Barnes has written at least two books (Candle and The Sky So Big and Black) based on the rather terrifying premise of meme-like computer viruses developing the ability to jump from electronic operating systems to organic ones (i.e., human minds) via the transmission of a sequence of verbal and visual inputs. It's less of a stretch to see everyday religion, politics, and the advertising profession (which nowadays includes a substantial portion of both religion and politics) as nothing more than an ongoing Darwinian competition, not between human beings, but between competing memes.

Extending the metaphor a bit further, each media in which memes can be transmitted can be likened to a new population of potential carriers, like a new population of hosts for a virus to inhabit, or a new continent for a species of animal to populate. Blogs are one of the newest vectors for transmission, and the infection has been raging at fever-strength for the past couple of years. (By now, you're infected, either agreeing with what I say or busily manufacturing the antibodies of counter-arguments or boredom.) But I seem to detect a certain dropoff in the furor of BlogMania nowadays.

Perhaps the population of memes proliferating through the blog population is beginning to subside, as the population of a virus in a host, or of animals in a previously unpopulated continent, rapidly climbs to a peak and then stabilizes or declines.

Does that make me a "fit survivor"? Or just a particularly susceptible carrier?

1 comment:

Felix said...

Trebor @ 4:40PM | 2004-03-16| permalink

Back at Thee U. I had a theory that American's were defined as "Those who knew what 'GILLIGAN!' meant." A meme. ~ Trebor

email | website

Trebor @ 9:40PM | 2004-03-16| permalink

Godwin's Law is Bunk:

How do you define "start of a thread?" After all, people can insert whole new ideas or thoughts "into" a thread and thereby keep it "alive." Since there is no limit to the number of tangents a thread can take, there should be no theoretical limit to overall thread length. ~ Trebor

email | website

Felix @ 3:19PM | 2004-03-17| permalink

At some point, if any political thread goes on long enough, the "Nazi" card will inevitably be played. That's Godwin's Law. It's really just an extrapolation of the idea that given an infinite series of random events, any possible result will inevitably occur eventually. Nazi comparisons in political discussions are popular enough that it usually doesn't take long, unless such comparisons are forestalled by something like Godwin's Law.

The corollary, that any such comparison immediately ends the usefulness of the thread, is what seems dubious to me.

email | website

Trebor @ 2:17AM | 2004-03-18| permalink

It sounds more like the law of entropy to me.

Remember, threads aren't linear, and they are as likely to branch as they are to terminate (or more so). As a result, a thread never really dies. ~ Trebor

~ Trebor

email | website