The perils of freebies
The Washington Times today carries an article about the Council for American-Islamic Relations and its recent campaign of donating books to libraries. CAIR says the books are intended to promote harmonious understanding of Islam; critics charge that the books are pro-Islamic propaganda that deliberately obfuscate harsh passages from the Qu'ran and other elements of Islamic doctrine and practice.
I haven't seem the particular books in question, but I do recall seeing some materials that were donated to my former employer's library by an organization based in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and which raised similar issues. The books were quite clearly biased, and included strained reasoning which I would consider quite unconvincing coming from the mouth of a high school debater, much less a purportedly scholarly source. For example, one of the books, Woman in the Shade of Islam, justifies sex-based restrictions on women with the metaphorical argument that, if a ship had two groups of passengers who were assigned to different decks of the ship, it would be foolish for the group assigned to the lower deck to insist on drilling holes for water. The book also asserts that Islam is superior to other religions because it protects women from "being exposed to places of iniquity" such as nightclubs, theaters, etc. I've known more than one woman who would gladly eschew such "protection".
Despite this, I was disappointed that the library refused to make them available to the public. Flawed as they are, they offer a useful glimpse inside a mindset that has substantial significance in the modern world, just as the tracts and other materials put out by fundamentalist Christian churches and publishing houses in the U.S. are important sources for understanding the worldview of those who write them and read them. The danger would be in allowing only materials of this type to represent Islam, or Christianity. Or of excluding them entirely, and thus distorting the collection by omission.
The article also refers to Jehovah's Witnesses, Scientologists, Mormons, et al, who are also frequently eager to "help" the library by donating copies of their latest tracts, or in the case of Mormons, offering to "update" the library's collection by replacing old copies of the Book of Mormon or other documents with "newer", "more attractive" editions. This is one area where caution is justified, and older materials should not be blithely discarded. See Jerald and Sandra Tanner's analysis of changes in the Book of Mormon for an understanding of how such offers are not entirely motivated by charity. Religions which retroactively alter their scriptures while simultaneously claiming that those scriptures are infallible have a vested interest in removing public access to older editions.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Fiend @ 1:39AM | 2003-10-22| permalink
I, too, am disappointed that the library chose not to display the Islamic books to the public. Women in the Shade of Islam, for example, happens to be an extremely popular book among certain members of the Islamic community. Not a loss though; since Everything's On The Internet (TM) anyway, that book is available for mass dissemination on a number of websites.
(Note, however, that the metaphorical ship argument can hardly be called “strained reasoning” when it’s been directly attributed to the Prophet himself.)
email | website
Felix @ 1:17PM | 2003-10-22| permalink
Perhaps it can't be called strained by a good Muslim, but that's not a category that applies to me! (I'm not a very good Baptist or any-other-denominationalist either, other than perhaps troublemaker.)
I noted that the book was listed as being available on a number f websites, but I wasn't able to retrieve the .pdf or the full text from the first two or three I tried. My computer was having other problems last night, though, so the fault may lie there.
email | website
Carlos Zamora @ 7:34PM | 2003-10-22| permalink
A few years ago the Mormons made us that generous offer, but luckily whoever was collection development librarian at the time declined.
I suppose revising the Book of Mormon doesn't necessarily contradict belief in its infallibility, if one assumes that God can change his mind.
email | website
Post a Comment